Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Emotion Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ping, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Beilock, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reach For What You Like: The Body's Role in Shaping Preferences

Raedy M. Ping

Department of Psychology, The University of Chicago, USA

Sonica Dhillon

Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, USA

Sian L. Beilock

Department of Psychology, The University of Chicago, USA, beilock{at}uchicago.edu

The position of individuals' bodies (e.g., holding a pencil in the mouth in a way that either facilitates or inhibits smiling musculature) can influence their emotional reactions to the stimuli they encounter, and can even impact their explicit preferences for one item over another. In this article we begin by reviewing the literature demonstrating these effects, explore mechanisms to explain this body-preference link, and introduce new work from our lab that asks whether one's bodily or motor experiences might also shape preferences in situations where the body is not contorted in a particular position, or when there is no intention to act. Such work suggests that one consequence of perceiving an object is the automatic and covert motor simulation of acting on this object. This, in turn, provides individuals with information about how easy or hard this action would be. It transpires that we like to do what is easy, and we also prefer objects that are easier to act on. The notion that judgments of object likeability are driven by motoric information furthers embodied cognition theories by demonstrating that even our preferences are grounded in action.

Key Words: affordances • embodiment • preferences

Emotion Review, Vol. 1, No. 2, 140-150 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1754073908100439


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Emotion ReviewHome page
A. M. Glenberg, B. J. Webster, E. Mouilso, D. Havas, and L. M. Lindeman
Gender, Emotion, and the Embodiment of Language Comprehension
Emotion Review, April 1, 2009; 1(2): 151 - 161.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Emotion ReviewHome page
A. S. Heberlein and A. P. Atkinson
Neuroscientific Evidence for Simulation and Shared Substrates in Emotion Recognition: Beyond Faces
Emotion Review, April 1, 2009; 1(2): 162 - 177.
[Abstract] [PDF]